Abstract

This page introduces a major revision and evolution of the Sgai language, which was defined as a Scenic Intuitive Glomerating Ideal Language (SIGIL), and which dates from 2006. The language is still classified as an a-priori invention, and many morphological elements and some words from the original Sgai have been retained, just the adamic aspect—where every detail including its phonaesthemics was worked out from first principles—has been found to be impractical, sadly. Thus, the original will be referred to as proto-Sgai, and treated as an ancestor to the current language. Work on the current version began in December 2020 ※

1 Introduction

1.1 Features

Features inherited from proto-Sgai include the following:

• maximum clarity in the phonology
• morphemes distinct phonetically from word-roots
• may be spoken as an uninterrupted stream without ambiguity
• minimum word size, especially for common roots and particles
• versatile & simple methods for word-building
• phrase grouping tags for logic
• metaphors of scene and energy for interpreting phrases
• easy shift between noun, verb and adjective
• numerals
• dedicated writing systems (slightly revised)

Elements dropped from proto-Sgai include the following:

• some awkward phonemes
• phonaesthemes for root words
• word-building and morphology hampered by phonaesthemic requirements
• separate passive verb system

Innovations in the current language include the following:

• more intuitive but versatile phrase construction
• comprehensive stochastic lexicon

1.2 The stochastic element

Vocabulary is generated using semi-random assignment. This is almost the direct opposite method of proto-Sgai, which assigned meaning by considering the phonaesthemes involved, in a bio-semantic and non-arbitrary fashion. The main problems with that method were the time involved in analyzing the metaphors, and the growing amount of overlap where many different words could be derivable from the same phonaesthemes. There were still subjective decisions, as well as considerations of practicality and harmony, so the process became very tedious in spite of its potential for pure non-arbitrariness.

The source for the current lexicon is a revised and expanded version of Richard Harrison’s wonderful Universal Language Dictionary of 1996. Within a few milliseconds, the entire corpus of almost 1800 words was assigned to unique root-word phoneme structures and tabulated (roughly speaking). There are no overlaps (homonyms) in the base lexicon, and of course no etymologies outside of our own word-building. There is also a nicely varied mix of phonemes, without the subconscious preferences and accidental repetitions & collisions which can occur in a manually constructed lexicon. And with the absence of preference in word assignment comes a sense of fairness and detachment, with no word better or more prestigious than another (although such attributes might accrue over time).

The result is really no different to that faced by someone learning a new language from an unrelated language family. While a phonaesthemic system could theoretically be decoded just by reading the phonemes, and be easy to learn, in practice, such a fully mnemonic vocabulary is no easier to use than one where we struggle initially with a personal set of mnemonics. In either case, eloquence will involve choosing combinations of existing words (phonemes) in a euphonious manner, with appropriate-interesting-witty word-compounding and phrase-design, as desired; and this is ultimately how any natural language’s final grammar and syntax will have evolved.

Obviously, the lexicon will appear completely fresh. But it may come as a surprise just how apt many of the lexicon assignments look and sound. I have written elsewhere about the tenuous but intellectually satisfying link between randomness and angelic intervention. Let’s just say that that part of the language which labels this world, came “from another world”.

1.3 Phoneme inventory

The symbols used here to represent the phonemes come from the International Phonetic Alphabet.

C = main consonants: [ b d f ɡ h k j l m n p ɹ s ʃ t θ v w z ʒ   bɾ kɾ pɾ tɾ ]

V = main vowels: [ ɑ æ e i ɔ ɜ u y  ɑi ɑu ɑy ɛi ɛo ɔi ɯɑ ]

affric = [ tʃ dʒ ts dz ]

other consonants: [ ð fɾ ʔ p’ t’ q’ tʃ’ ]

other vocalics: [ ɹ̩ m̩ n̩ ]

short vowels: [ ə  ɑ̆  ɑʔ ]

tone: relaxed, rising [ ˇ ], (high), falling [ ˆ ]

Final [b] is unreleased. Unvoiced plosives [ k p t ] are aspirated. A final [n] may shift in sound to [ m ɱ ŋ ] depending on the following consonant (a common effect called sandhi), but ideally should be treated as a nasalization of the previous vowel. Vowel [ɜ] is used to represent “some central-ish vowel distinct from the other seven monophthongs”, so might range as [ œ ɜ ɞ ə ɘ ɵ ]. Vowels [ɔ] and [y] may range to [o] and [ʉ]. Diphthongs are chosen such that there is no semivowel by-product, which would introduce ambiguity; for example [uɑ] may sound like [u.wɑ]. Affricate [tʃ] may shift inward to [ʈʂ]. Explicit schwa [ə] is used in particles, is always short (reduced), and unvoiced (perhaps vanishing) after an unvoiced consonant. All other vowels are normally not short, although diph­thongs may have the same length as a normal single vowel.

2 Grammar – words

2.1 Structure of a word

Here and below is laid out the parse-structure of the grammar (bottom up), including all particles.

honorific =

☥	Word[s] meaning “good” and specific to the word being invoked (see below); similar to Thai คุณ, and titles like Mr, Mrs, Reverend in English. In writing, may be abbreviated to an ankh symbol. Might be used with the [də] prefix.

prefix =

ɡə	male who ...
bə	female who ...
də	possibly non-Sgai word, proper noun rendered as ...
əl | hə	abstraction, idea, state of being, doing ...

root = CV | CV [ b n θ v ]

magcoda =

u	not, none, opposite, complement
i	few, small amount
æ	some(what), roughly, mainly, clearly, enough, medium
ɑ	very, large(ly), much, all
ɔ	overly, too, excessive, beyond

mag = [j] magcoda

slink =

Ø	of type, which is, labeled as ...
lə	like, similar to ...
mə	of, belonging to, associated with, pertaining to ...
fə	using, by means of, via ... ; -ing, acting upon ...
ʃə	together with, accompanied by ...
sə	then, followed by ... ; is the number (count) of ...
səs	is the number (ordinal) of ...
sfə	for, used by ... ; which undergoes ...   —reverse of “using”
smə	having, furnished with, with power/action of ...   —reverse of “of”

suffix =

ʃ	darling, special, poetically
s	jargon, anaphor, spoken of, topical, obvious, abbrev.

word   = (honorific)  (prefix)  root  (mag)  (slink  root  (mag) ...)  (suffix)

The root here refers to an item of vocabulary in the Lexicon. In word-building, any part of speech may be co-opted to help form a meaningful string. The magcoda comes directly from proto-Sgai, helping here to form a simple root modifier, and important later in forming the phrase modifiers (see §3.2).

2.2 Preparing actors

words = word ([dʒɔ] slink word) | word ([dʒə] word)

dʒɔ	that, which, who ...
dʒə	which is ...

plural = [sə]

detachPron =

bwɑ̆	thou, thee (passive)
bjɑ̆	thou, thee (active)
dwɑ̆	other party (passive)
djɑ̆	other party (active)
ɡwɑ̆	I, me (passive)
ɡjɑ̆	I, me (active)

The possessive may be formed with this as a suffix upon word. For example:

mə ɡjɑ̆

mine, possessed by me   —and “active” tag transfers to the possession

actor   = (plural) words [ tə kə kətə ] | (plural) detachPron

tə	is active party
kə	is passive party
kətə	is both active & passive, affecting self or each other

Here words is given an overall nounal meaning, and may be a nominalized verb (gerund) or reified adjective.

Plural prefix or double plural prefix [səs] on the detachable pronoun can make the following (just active shown):

sə ɡjɑ̆	we (I & thou)
sə bjɑ̆	many of you
sə djɑ̆	others, them
səs ɡjɑ̆	all of us (I & many of you)
səs bjɑ̆	all except me (many of you & others)
səs djɑ̆	everything, including me

2.3 The bare verb

reflect = [sə]   —q.v. noun pluralizer

manner = [dzu] words

dzu	in the manner of ...   —forms adverb from other parts of speech

verb   = (reflect) words (manner)

Here words is given an overall verbal meaning, and may be activity extrapolated from a noun or adjective. See §3.4.4 for the use of reflectivity.

3 Grammar – action

3.1 The expanded verb

A =

p’ | bɑʔ	you, thee (party in front of me)
t’ | dɑʔ	other party (not present)
q’ | ɡɑʔ	me
tʃ’ | dʒɑʔ	something, unspecified, unknown
p’q’ | bəɡɑʔ	you and me
p’tʃ’ | bədʒɑʔ	you and something
t’q’ | dəɡɑʔ	other and me
tʃ’q’ | dʒəɡɑʔ	something and me

This tag comes immediately after verb and indicates one (or two) of the actors involved with the verb. Whether the referent is Passive or Active depends on whether actor tag [t] or [k] precedes the verb. For example with [p’]   ⇒   “verb you” or “verbed by you”. See §3.4 for further explanation.

With the double tag, the second refers to the actor tagged by [t] or [k] immediately before the verb. For example with [p’q’]   ⇒   “I verb you” or “I am verbed by you”. See §3.4 for further explanation.

The ejective form comes from proto-Sgai, and is intended for relatively quiet speech. The voiced form uses a short vowel and glottal stop, and can be used for louder speech, and song.

tense = [ ɡ p ] magcoda   —see Deictic phrase modifiers below

ɡ	past
p	future

time = tense (words)

place = [ðə] words

ðə	taking place at, with location ...

tmod = (time) (place)

edmod = [ tɾ n v w d t θ f b m ʒ ] magcoda   —see phrase modifiers below

tɾ	periodicity
n	certainty
v	quiddity
w	intake
d	gravity
t	differential
θ	quality
f	deference
b	directness
m	intimacy
ʒ	acceptance

ed = edmod (edmod ...)

vmod = (tmod) (ed)

action   = verb  A  ([ʔə] vmod [pə])

Verbal block is closed by the ejective of A or by [p], just as [t] or [k] closes an actor. Also, the function of glottal in the vmod prefix can be assumed by the ejective release.

3.2 Phrase modifiers

Phrase modifiers are inherited from proto-Sgai. They come at the end of a phrase or sentence, and are formed very much like rootwords, their CV syllable having a phonaesthemic consonant but followed by a possibly toned magnitude vowel (see magcoda above). They act as clarifying or editorial comments on the statement, and may be used in sequence.

If using tone, the [pə] closer is not necessary; then, if there is only one mod, it ends the entire statement with \ a falling tone; a sequence of mods will form a tonal contour: rise (high (high)) fall / \.

When translating especially the attitudinal phrase modifiers, it may be wise to expand upon the meanings given above, to avoid sounding too transparent and tactless.

3.3 The bare scene

act   =

	1.  (actorA [k]) actorB [t] action   —by B upon A
	2.  (actorA [t]) actorB [k] action   —upon B by A
	3.  (actorB) [t] verb [ʔɜ] actorA ([k]) ([ʔə] vmod [p])   —action by B upon A
	4.  (actorB) [k] verb [ʔɜ] actorA ([t]) ([ʔə] vmod [p])   —action upon B by A
	5.  [k] action | [t] action
	6.  verb [p]

1,2. superscript A marks (first) ejective tag referent.
3,4. particle [ʔɜ] = “refer to previous verb for ...”, and closes the verb block without an ejective.
5. if using double verb tag, or other party is known.
6. if parties’ relationship continues and there is no new vmod.

Notice how forms 3 and 4 allow phrases which are not verb-final. More examples of verb arrangement are described below.

3.4 Verb design

Verbs can be made from other parts of speech, for example:

	sword	⇒   do the sword thing: cut, hack, stab something
	feather	⇒   be/do as a feather: float, be light
	black	⇒   be black

And verbs may take one or two explicit arguments (actors). Note how the verb “sword”, like the more ordinary “cut”, involves two parties. The other two verbs “feather” and “black”, like the ordinary verb “sleep”, seem to involve only one.

3.4.1 Two-argument verbs

The essential, default design of an act involves one or two slots before the verb to hold the actor[s], and one or two slots after to hold the ejective-references, in the same order. The second ejective slot (if applicable) has a silent default of [t’] “other”.

A simple two-argument transitive verb might be arranged like this:

actor1	actor2	verb	ref1	ref2
Ø	dog	bite	me	Ø

Depending on the actor tag before the verb, the ejective’s referent takes the opposing role, and may change the verb’s voice from active to passive.

Ø	dog [kə]	bite	[q’]	Ø
Ø	the dog (passive)	is bitten by	me	Ø

Both actors may be named in the scene.

postman [kə]	dog [tə]	bite	[t’]	(ref2 → dog)
the postman (undergoer)	the dog (agent)	bites	him	Ø

In the next example all slots are filled, and there is pronoun-elaboration, an expression of “I love you”. Note that the order of double ejectives is fixed (see A in §3.1 above), as required for their ease of articulation. Using [t’] here would make the sentence more literal.

flower [kə]	painter [tə]	love	[p’]	[q’]
(symbol for you)	(symbol for me)	love	you	me

The minimal form of this expression would leave an unnamed active tag, to match the second ejective referent’s role. The actor tag may then be interpreted as a prefix on the verb.

Ø

[tə]

love

[p’q’]

3.4.2 Two-argument intransitive verbs

An intransitive verb normally has a single argument (actor). By introducing a second argument, we can show aspects of causation or control.

old lady [kə]	bus-conductor [tə]	sit	[t’]	Ø	—she was sat down by the conductor
Ø	window [kə]	black	[q’]	Ø	—I blackened the window

In some cases it may be possible to deduce an appropriate second actor’s role, perhaps by looking at the balance, or direction, of energy between the parties.

old lady [tə]	armchair [kə]	sit	[t’]	Ø	—her seat was passive, sat upon
old lady [kə]	armchair [tə]	sit	[t’]	Ø	—the chair was instrumental, she was frail

3.4.3 One-argument verbs

There are three types of verb arrangements involving a single argument (actor). First is the normal intransitive verb. Lack of a second party is shown by the insertion of the particle [əl] before the verb.

actor1	actor2	verb	ref1	ref2
old lady [t]	[əl]	sit	[t’]	Ø	—she is just sitting
old lady [k]	[əl]	sit	[t’]	Ø	—she has to sit (undergo this state)

A more abstract case involves the special ejective referent “something, unspecified”.

[t]	[əl]	sit	[tʃ’]	Ø	—there is sitting going on
[k]	[əl]	sit	[tʃ’]	Ø	—something is made to sit

A less anonymous case uses a transitive verb together with the “something” referent, and leaves the first actor slot necessarily empty.

Ø	bus-conductor [kə]	bite	[tʃ’]	Ø	—something bit the conductor
Ø	old lady [tə]	bite	[tʃ’]	Ø	—she bit something

3.4.4 Reflective verbs

The sense of doing to oneself (reflexive) or doing mutually with another (reciprocal), can be expressed in two ways. One uses a prefix for reflection, as if the parties look in a mirror. The other shows the parties share both states of agency and passivity.

Ø	Ø	[sə] verb	[p’]	Ø	—you verb yourself
Ø	Ø	[sə] verb	[q’]	Ø	—I verb myself
Ø	Ø	[sə] verb	[p’]	[q’]	—we verb each other

actor1	[kətə]	verb	ref1	Ø	—named actor1 verbs itself
actor1 [tʃə] actor2	[kətə]	verb	[t’]	Ø	—actor1 & actor2 verb each other

4 Grammar – phrases

4.1 Phrase grouping

clause = (tmod [tʃɔ]) act   —using the flow-word from clause tags below

openctag, closectag = affric V (tone) | [m̩] (tone) | [fɾ] V

Clause tags (nestable): { X openctag Y closectag }

openctags =		closectags =
4.1.1 Logical
tʃə	and; with; also ... (both X and Y; X∧Y)	dʒi
tʃe	possibly, but certainly ... (◊X∧Y)	dʒi
tʃɔi	and possibly also ... (X∧◊Y)	dʒy
tʃi	not that, but still; excluded, leaving ... (¬X∧Y)	dʒi
tʃɑy	but not; except for; excluding ... (X∧¬Y)	dʒy
fɾɑy	not that and not ... (neither X nor Y; ¬X∧¬Y)	fɾɔ
fɾɑ	or; else; otherwise ... (logical xor; X or Y not both; X⊕Y)	fɾɔ
tsɑ	and/or ... (logical inclusive or; X or Y or both; X∨Y)	tsɜ
tsɑy	possibly, or possibly ... (X or Y or neither, not both; logical nand)	tsɜ
4.1.2 Conditional
tʃɹ	so then; therefore; resulting in; so that; ⇒ ...	ʈʂɹ̂
fɾe	with the proviso that; only if; not unless ...	fɾu
dʒe	because of; depending on; if; given; ⇐ ...	dʒu
tʃu	doesn’t imply; doesn’t result in ...	ʈʂɹ̂
dʒɔi	not because of; but not if/given ...	dʒu
4.1.3 Temporal
tʃɹ	and then; followed by ...	Ø
dʒɑ	following after; only when ... (reverse of “and then”)	dʒɜ
fɾi	while also; during; meanwhile ...	fɾɜ
4.1.4 Expositional
m̩	that; the details of which are ...	m̂
m̌	re-expressed as; in other words; for example ...	m̂
də	is now defined by & written as ... (q.v. prefix)	m̂
tʃɔ	likewise, similarly, well, er ... (flow-word like Thai ก็ )	Ø

Here closectag is optional if the nesting is not complex. The flow-word [tʃɔ] may also be used like punctuation, for example as a dash or ellipsis, to break up a phrase.

4.2 Prelude and finish

prelCV = [ b d l m n s v ʒ ] [ i æ ɔ ]

prelude = prelCV [ɹ]   pause

4.2.1 Logical-conditional-temporal
niɹ	Condition[s]:
liɹ	Choice[s]:
biɹ	On the other hand / Contrarily:
diɹ	Reason / Explanation:
viɹ	Result / Finally / In summary:
ʒiɹ	Sequence of events:
4.2.2 Expositional
ʒæɹ	Topic / Prelude:
dæɹ	Observation / Analysis / In more depth:
N sæɹ	{ Number of } things / Points:
læɹ	Aside / By the way / Casual remark / Humble opinion:
mæɹ	For example:
næɹ	Quote:
væɹ	Instruction:
4.2.3 Informational
mɔɹ	Question:
lɔɹ	Just suppose / Hypothetically / Consider this:
vɔɹ	Not the case:
ʒɔɹ	Predictably / As we expect / Still the case:
nɔɹ	News / Update / Gossip:
bɔɹ	Surprisingly / Oddly:
dɔɹ	Don’t forget / Beware / Advice:

preludeClose = [n] | pause

The prelude was inspired by Seaspeak, a simplified English which uses simple, strict and clear protocols in its phrases. Here we also use simple/clear consonants and three vowels phonetically far apart. Some of these may take a plural [s] prefix. And they may be emphasized or closed by an edmod later in the verb block.

Finally ...

sentence, scene = (prelude)  clause ((openctag clause ... (closectag)) ...)  (preludeClose) 。

5 Words

5.1 Small talk

A few essential words for civilized speech. The first three come from proto-Sgai, and each is irregular in some way.

kɜɡ	hello   —an irregular syllable, with no inherent meaning, from [kɯɡ]
hɑp’q’	thank you (you improve me)   —assumes referent order is active passive
zɜq’	sorry (I ruined it)   —assumes referent is active, from [zøq’]
sbəkɛinʃɡəkɛinʃ	dear ladies & gentlemen   —the less fancy version is [sətɾɯɑʃjyn]

5.2 Numbers

Names of the numerals and the system of counting also come from proto-Sgai. They are derived from phon­aesthemic words, and the count from one to ten is particulary euphonious. Notice the use of medial flap [-ɾ-] to signify repetition/duplication. The number 2019 is pronounced [tɾysbɑ-bɑ-nɜjɑ].

Number	Sgai word	Derivation
1	ty	single
2	tɾy	pair
3	nɜ	angle apex (from [nø])
4	slɜ	sides (from [səlø])
5	tɔ	flower (petals)
6	pɔ	round
7	tihɑ	good number
8	tiwɑ	big number
9	nɜjɑ	bigger 3 (from [nøja])
10	bɑ	hands-full
-----
11	bɑ-ty	etc.
20	tɾybɑ	2 as handsful
30	nɜbɑ	etc.
100	bɾɑ	dup 10 ⇒ 10 × 10
k	sbɑ	many 10 ⇒ 10 × 10 × 10
10k	bɑjɑ	bigger 10 ⇒ 1,000 × 10
100k	bɾɑjɑ	bigger 100 ⇒ 1,000 × 100
M	sbɾɑ	many 100 ⇒ 100 × 100 × 100
G	səsbɑ	many k ⇒ 1,000 × 1,000 × 1,000
E12	sbɑjɑ	many 10k ⇒ 10,000 × 10,000 × 10,000
E15	sbɾɑjɑ	many 100k ⇒ 100,000 × 100,000 × 100,000
E18	səsbɾɑ	many M ⇒ 1,000,000 × 1,000,000 × 1,000,000
Hexadecimal context:
ten	bɑ	10 (decimal = A of hexadecimal)
eleven	beʔ	B
twelve	seʔ	C
thirteen	deʔ	D
fourteen	heʔ	E
fifteen	feʔ	F
sixteen	ɡeʔ	G (the radix = 10 hexadecimal)

5.3 Lexicon

Lexicon assignments to the two-phoneme roots were made on 27th April 2021. These shortest roots are for words that are not only common, but that might also be versatile and useful in word-building. (Most morphemic particles are also short, two or one-and-a-half phonemes in size.) Assignments to the three and four-phoneme roots were made on 29th April 2021, with some four and all five-phoneme roots still vacant.

A small number of words were necessarily reserved to specific root-form phoneme combinations, shown below. The 65 phrase modifiers of §3.2 above will overlap ordinary CV root-form assignments, but are not ambiguous since they are always flanked by [ʔə] and [pə], or have tone.

jɑ  jæ  ji  jɔ  ju	the mags used in simple word-building, shown in §2.1 above
ɡɑi	“fortuitous thing, stochastic outcome”   —plural gives the language name
vɔn	“non-entity (which is)”   —a negating prefix for word-building; q.v. [vɔɹ]

In addition, it is possible to use words from the existing proto-Sgai lexicon, which are often (by design) very apt. Some words have phonemes which are no longer used, namely [ ʔh hl hw ŋ x dɾ ɡɾ ø ɯ ], and a sophisticated speaker should try to preserve them. Apart from these words, there will be collisions between the CV forms of proto-Sgai and current two-phoneme roots, so there is no longer zero ambiguity if the old words are used.

⇒ The Lexicon    

Some noticeable imperfections of the language will be dealt with in on-going fashion, so some small changes may appear on this page.

6 Examples

6.1 Tower of Babel excerpt

6.1.1 This is a translation from Genesis XI verses 1 and 2, written here using the IPA, and then plain ASCII:

ʒæɹ : ʃɛoməlky tʃɔ bɑtysəsjɛiv tʃɔ ɹɯɑndəbebɜl n ||
1 tʃɹ kɾænjɑt tysbɑyθ dʒɔʃ tyszɔ k fɔt’ əɡɔp ||
2 tʃɹ təl sɑuntʃ’ m kɾɔbk hɛont’ | fɾi ʒibpɾɑvk bɾut’ ðə θɑidəʃinɑɹp fɾɜ | tʃə gæt’ ðə mep ||

Zhaer: Sheom'lky tsho batyssjeiv tsho Ruuan d'Beboel n.
1 Tshr kraenjat tysbayth dzhosh tyszo kfot'gop.
2 Tshr tl saontsh' m krobk heont', fri zhibpravk broot' dh'thai d'Shinarp froetsh gaet' dh'mep.

6.1.2 Analysis:

topic:  history-OF-ABSTRACT-create -- eleven-TH-chapter -- tower-LABEL-babel ||
1 and-so  world-ALL-ACTIVE  one-COUNT-language  also  one-COUNT-voice  PASSIVE  was-had-by-IT  in-mythical-past ||
2 and-so  was-happening-STH  that  east-PASSIVE  was-left-by-THEM | meanwhile:
field:big-PASSIVE  encountered-by-THEM  where: province-LABEL-shinar | and  was-made-residence-by-THEM  where: there ||

6.1.3 As read by the language maker:

--session 25th August 2021--

6.1.4 Original in English:

Referring to Genesis, eleventh chapter, Tower of Babel –
1 And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
2 And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.

6.2 Shakespeare excerpt

6.2.1 This is a translation from the beginning of Shakespeare’s Sonnet XVIII:

ʒevməfɑyθ tʃə bwɑ̆θɛonʃ k syq’ əpæwɑ̂ |
ɹɑiv tʃə lɜju k sɑuvɑibɑʔ əʒɑ̂ |
sbɛovʃɛivt sədeθlibməkentɔk mɔvt’ |
tʃə ɹɔibɾɜməfɑyθt ʒɑθʒæθjɔk ɹɔvt’ ||

Zhevm'fayth tsh bwatheonsh ksyq'paewa\
Raiv tsh loeju ksaovaiba7 zha\
Sbeovsheivt sdethlibm'kentok movt'
Tsh roibroem'faytht zhathzhaethjok rovt'

6.2.2 Analysis:

day-OF-summer  with  you:dear-DARLING  PASSIVE  compared-by-ME  shall-question |
beautiful  and  varying-NOT  PASSIVE  are-being:more-YOU  pleasingly |
winds:violent-ACTIVE  buds:nice-OF-month:five-PASSIVE  shaken-by-IT |
and  contract:duration-OF-summer-ACTIVE  date:brief-TOO-PASSIVE  reflected-in-IT ||

6.2.3 As read by the language maker:

--session 25th August 2021--

6.2.4 Original in English:

Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?
Thou art more lovely and more temperate;
Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May,
And summer’s lease hath all too short a date.

7 Writing systems

7.1 Yônfaeth

7.2 Goev le Trith

7.3 Thoi (revision of Pranish)